Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 185/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.185.2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review request due to non-fulfillment of Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act conditions.

Numero d'incarto Sklep II DoR 185/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request to allow a review of the first-instance judgment. The defendant sought to overturn a ruling ordering them to pay 8,697.28 EUR plus statutory interest to the plaintiff. The court denied the request because the specific conditions required to permit a review under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not met.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A review request is inadmissible if the conditions for its admissibility under Article 367a are not fulfilled.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
review request admissibility Civil Procedure Act supreme court jurisdiction statutory interest claim procedural dismissal opposizione al precetto esecutivo legittimazione per agire in via esecutiva motivo di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367c, paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
VSRS Sklep II DoR 38/2019
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to case value exceeding statutory threshold.
Sklep III DoR 24/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal on lease termination and unjust enrichment conditions in Slovenian civil procedure.
Sodba II Ips 360/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming insufficient non-pecuniary damages for physical pain and mental distress after a fall.
Sodba III Ips 77/2011
Slovenian Supreme Court rejects appeal on warranty claim timing, ruling no statute of limitations applies to defense objections.
Sodba II Ips 719/2009
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where lower court failed to explain witness non-hearing but appellate court justified evidence rejection as non-essential.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Toženec je vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo pritožbenega sodišča, s katero je bila potrjena sodba sodišča prve stopnje, ki ga zavezuje toženi stranki plačati 8.697,28 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 24. 11. 2006 do plačila.

2. Ker niso izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena istega zakona).