Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 169/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.169.2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed review request as statutory conditions for admissibility were not met.

Numero d'incarto Sklep II DoR 169/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the plaintiffs' request for permission to file a review against the second-instance judgment. The plaintiffs argued for compensation, but the second-instance court upheld the first-instance dismissal of their claim. The court denied the review because the specific conditions required by Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; A review request is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for its admissibility are not fulfilled.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
review request admissibility conditions Code of Civil Procedure supreme court dismissal of claim motivi di revisione motivazione del mutamento giurisprudenza opposizione al precetto esecutivo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
Generato dall'IA
Sklep II DoR 237/2011
Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request because court fee was paid after the legal deadline expired.
Sklep III DoR 109/2010
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal request for most questions due to procedural defects and lack of importance.
Sklep III DoR 36/2012
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding whether a contract terminated before bankruptcy counts as a mutual breach under ZFPPIPP Article 24.
Sklep X Ips 92/2012
Supreme Court dismisses appeal claiming procedural merger is a significant legal issue under ZUS-1.
Sklep III DoR 31/2014
Supreme Court allows appeal regarding legal basis for compensation and civil penalty calculation for public broadcasting of sound recordings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP niso izpolnjeni, je VS RS predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena ZPP).

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožniki so vložili predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, s katero je bila potrjena sodba prvostopenjskega sodišča o zavrnitvi njihovega odškodninskega tožbenega zahtevka.

2. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso izpolnjeni, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena istega zakona).