Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 114/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.114.2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal permission request due to non-fulfillment of statutory conditions under Civil Procedure Act.

Numero d'incarto Sklep II DoR 114/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to appeal, upholding the lower court's dismissal of the lawsuit and cost allocation. The applicant argued for further review, but the court found that the legal prerequisites for granting an appeal permission were not met. Consequently, the request was denied pursuant to the specific provisions of the Civil Procedure Act regarding appeal thresholds.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act: An appeal permission request is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for granting such permission are not fulfilled.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Civil Procedure Act appeal permission statutory conditions dismissal of request Supreme Court review vizio di procedura procedura a più fasi azione con domande successive

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Act
Article 367c paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
VDSS sklep Psp 425/2011
Appeal dismissed; court enforcement of pension award not a direct social court matter.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 213/2023
Appeal dismissed; creditor lacks interest in mortgage suit when direct enforcement is already attempted and failed due to property exemption.
VSL sodba I Cpg 1471/2015
Contractual penalty upheld where parties knew deadline was impossible due to undefined scope.
Sklep II Ips 386/2008
Appeal dismissed because no single claim exceeds 1 million SIT despite multiple distinct factual bases.
VSL sklep I Cpg 322/2012
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by rejecting correctable defect in naming the defendant instead of ordering correction.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker niso izpolnjeni zakonski pogoji, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog za dopustitev revizije zavrnilo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo tožnikovo pritožbo in potrdilo sklepa sodišča prve stopnje, s katerima je bila zavržena tožba in tožniku naloženo plačilo stroškov postopka vsakega od tožencev.

2. Zoper navedeni sklep je tožnik vložil predlog za dopustitev revizije.

3. Ker pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, je Vrhovno sodišče predlog zavrnilo (drugi odstavek 367.c člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku).