Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 73/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.73.2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review application as procedural conditions under ZPP Art. 367a are not met.

Numero d'incarto Sklep II DoR 73/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's application for review of the second-instance judgment regarding a compensation claim for occupational exposure to isocyanates. The defendant argued that objective liability should be replaced by fault-based liability for the specific damages claimed. The court dismissed the application because the statutory conditions for admitting a review under Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure were not satisfied.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure: A review application is inadmissible if the conditions for its admission under Article 367a are not met, regardless of the substantive arguments regarding liability principles.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Code of Civil Procedure review application admission conditions occupational liability isocyanate exposure supreme court dismissed application nozione di malattia professionale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 367a of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367c of the Code of Civil Procedure
Generato dall'IA
VSRS Sklep VIII Ips 123/2018
Supreme Court allows appeal in occupational disease case, remanding for new assessment of disability percentage.
Sodba VIII Ips 19/2012
Supreme Court dismisses appeal in lead poisoning case, upholding lower court's compensation award based on objective conditions.
VDSS Sodba Psp 145/2024
Appeal dismissed; work injury caused swelling deemed valid reason for reduced work capacity periods.
Sodba VIII Ips 302/2004
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal in work injury case due to lack of causal link between job and illness.
Sodba II Ips 305/2005
Appeal dismissed; evidence value depends on content; causation not proven between nickel allergy and work exposure.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Odškodninski spor - pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena ZPP niso podani.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Tožnica je s tožbo zahtevala odškodnino za premoženjsko in za nepremoženjsko škodo, ki je posledica bolezni zaradi (dolgotrajne) izpostavljenosti izocianatom v času zaposlitve pri toženi stranki. Sodišče prve stopnje je z vmesno sodbo odločilo, da je temelj toženkine odškodninske odgovornosti podan, sodišče druge stopnje pa je vmesno sodbo prvostopenjskega sodišča potrdilo.

2. Tožena stranka je vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje. Meni, da za tožničino škodo ni objektivno odgovorna ter da je treba v konkretnem primeru vzročnost presojati po načelu krivde.

3. Pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani, zato je Vrhovno sodišče skladno z določbo drugega odstavka 367.c člena istega zakona predlog zavrnilo.