Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep III Ips 13/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:III.IPS.13.2009 Generato dall'IA

Appeal dismissed because the disputed amount did not exceed the statutory threshold for review in commercial cases.

Numero d'incarto Sklep III Ips 13/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's appeal against the second-instance court's judgment. The core fact was that the disputed monetary value of 19,752.04 EUR failed to surpass the 20,864.63 EUR threshold required for filing a review in commercial disputes. Consequently, the court held that the appeal was inadmissible under the relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, ruling that the lower court could have dismissed it directly.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 490 of the Code of Civil Procedure; Article 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure: In commercial disputes, a review is not permitted if the value of the disputed subject matter does not exceed the statutory limit, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
commercial disputes review threshold inadmissible appeal monetary value limit Code of Civil Procedure norme di procedura motivazione del mutamento giurisprudenza status giuridico anteriore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 490 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 377 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 154 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 130 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 13 of the Act on the Introduction of the Euro
Generato dall'IA
Sklep III Ips 188/2008
Appeal dismissed because separate factual bases for claims mean each must individually meet the value threshold for review.
Sklep III Ips 50/2013
Supreme Court dismisses appeal because defendant company deleted from register and has no legal successors.
Sklep III Ips 90/2008
CIS Court allows appeal against sales contract price difference claim due to missing contract termination notice.
Sklep in sodba III Ips 64/2008
Supreme Court partially allowed interest claim while dismissing other damages due to lack of proven loss exceeding interest.
Sklep III Ips 205/2008
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal in construction contract dispute due to insufficient value threshold for review.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revizija se zavrže.

Tožena stranka krije sama svoje stroške revizijskega postopka.

[JEDRO]

Ker vrednost spornega predmeta ni presegala mejne vrednosti za dovoljenost revizije, revizija, ki jo je tožena stranka vložila zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, ni dovoljena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Obravnavani postopek se je pred sodiščem prve stopnje končal pred uveljavitvijo Zakona o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP-D; Uradni list RS, št. 45/2008). Zato se po drugem odstavku njegovega 130. člena nadaljuje po dotedanjih določbah Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP; Uradni list RS, št. 73/2007 – uradno prečiščeno besedilo).

2. Po določbi 490. člena ZPP revizija v gospodarskih sporih ni bila dovoljena, če vrednost spornega predmeta glede izpodbijanega dela pravnomočne sodbe ni presegala 20.864,63 EUR (prej 5,000.000,00 SIT).(1)

3. V obravnavani zadevi je bilo toženi stranki naloženo plačilo 19.752,04 EUR z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi. Ker navedena vrednost ni presegala mejne vrednosti za dovoljenost revizije, revizija, ki jo je tožena stranka vložila zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje, ni dovoljena. Vrhovno sodišče jo je zato zavrglo na podlagi 377. člena ZPP, kar bi v mejah svojih pravic lahko storilo že sodišče prve stopnje.

4. Ker tožena stranka z revizijo ni uspela, po prvem odstavku 154. člena ZPP sama krije svoje stroške revizijskega postopka.

---.---

Op. št. (1): Po prvem odstavku 13. člena Zakona o uvedbi eura (Uradni list RS, št. 114/2006) se šteje, da se tolarski zneski, navedeni v predpisih in sodnih aktih, z dnem uvedbe eura (1. 1. 2007) glasijo na euro, preračunano po tečaju zamenjave. Tečaj zamenjave je določen v Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1086/2006 z dne 11. 7. 2006 (UL L št. 195 z dne 15. 7. 2006) in znaša 239,640 slovenskih tolarjev za 1 euro.