Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSL sklep II Kp 281/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:II.KP.281.2000 Generato dall'IA

Appeal against prosecutor's evidence request rejection during investigation is inadmissible under Criminal Procedure Code.

Numero d'incarto VSL sklep II Kp 281/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance court's rejection of the prosecutor's evidence request for handwriting analysis. The defendant argued for the execution of the proposed forensic tests, while the prosecution contended the appeal was procedurally invalid. The court ruled that since the investigation was already legally initiated, appeals against decisions made by the investigating senate under Article 399/2 of the Criminal Procedure Code are not permitted.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 177/1 of the Criminal Procedure Act; Article 399/2 of the Criminal Procedure Act: Appeals against decisions by the investigating senate regarding the performance of specific investigative acts during the investigation phase are inadmissible unless otherwise provided by law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
investigative senate procedural inadmissibility Criminal Procedure Code evidence request rejection handwriting analysis investigation phase appeal rights esame grafologico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 177/1 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 399/2 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Article 390 of the Criminal Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
VSRS Sodba I Ips 30158/2019
Supreme Court allows appeal against lower court's dismissal of investigation request due to misapplication of joint crime provisions.
VSK sklep II Kp 49857/2014
Court allows prosecutor's appeal, quashing first instance dismissal due to failure to prove severe illness preventing trial attendance.
VSL Sklep V Kp 5616/2016
Court allows evidence from open forum despite pseudonym, rejecting Article 37 privacy claim for private prosecution cases.
Sodba I Kp 8/2011
Criminal appeal partially allowed; costs allocation adjusted based on defendant's financial hardship and procedural review scope.
Sodba I Ips 13427/2012-123
Supreme Court dismisses request for legality protection regarding a home search conducted without two witnesses present at the start.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pritožba obdolženega R.P. se zavrže kot nedovoljena.

[JEDRO]

Zoper sklep, s katerim je zunajobravnavni senat na podlagi člena 177/I ZKP zavrnil dokazna predloga državnega tožilca, pritožba glede na določbo člena 399/II ZKP ni dovoljena.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z uvodoma navedenim sklepom je zunajobravnavni senat sodišča prve stopnje na podlagi 1. odstavka 177. člena ZKP zavrnil dokazna predloga okrožne državne tožilke za opravo grafološke analize pisave in sodno prepoznavo. Zoper ta sklep je vložil pritožbo obdolženec in smiselno predlagal spremembo sklepa tako, da se predlagana dokaza izvedeta. Višji državni tožilec je predlagal zavrženje obdolženčeve pritožbe kot nedovoljene. Pritožba ni dovoljena. Iz razlogov izpodbijanega sklepa izhaja, da je sodišče prve stopnje navedeni sklep izdalo med preiskavo, saj je zoper obdolženca preiskava pravnomočno uvedena z dne 26.6.2000.

Po določbi II. odstavka 399. člena ZKP zoper sklepe, ki jih pred ali med preiskavo izda senat, ni pritožbe, razen če je v tem zakonu drugače določeno. Določilo I. odstavka 177. člena ZKP, po katerem je senat pristojen, da odloči ali se opravi posamezno preiskovalno dejanje v primeru, če se preiskovalni sodnik ne strinja s predlogom strank, pa ne predvideva, da bi stranke zoper tako odločitev senata imele pravico do pritožbe. Glede na navedeno, kljub temu, da je bil strankam dan pravni pouk, da je pravica do pritožbe zoper ta sklep dovoljena, pritožba zoper takšno odločitev glede na določbo člena 399/II ZKP ni dovoljena, zato jo je sodišče druge stopnje na podlagi člena 390.

ZKP kot nedovoljeno zavrglo.