Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSC sklep Kr 41/2000 ECLI:SI:VSCE:2000:KR.41.2000 Generato dall'IA

Extramarital relationship between defendant and court clerk justifies transfer of territorial jurisdiction to another court.

Numero d'incarto VSC sklep Kr 41/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The presiding judge of the requesting court proposed transferring territorial jurisdiction to another competent court due to an extramarital relationship between the defendant and the court clerk. The Supreme Court in Celje found this relationship a significant reason for the transfer and approved the proposal. Consequently, jurisdiction was assigned to the Okrajno sodišče v Š. pri C., which is also the nearest court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Zakon o kazenskem postopku; Zakon o sodiščih: An extramarital relationship between the accused and a court clerk constitutes a significant reason for transferring territorial jurisdiction to another competent court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
extramarital relationship court clerk territorial jurisdiction transfer of jurisdiction significant reason criminal procedure supreme court legittimazione dei vicini

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
III. odstavek 35. člena ZKP
Opomba: Zoper ta sklep ni pritožbe (III. odstavek 35. člena ZKP)Đ
Generato dall'IA
VSRS Sklep III R 34/2016
Appeal dismissed: Same judge leading bankruptcy and related litigation does not automatically violate impartiality rights.
Sklep I R 104/2006
Foreign partner of court clerk is not grounds for transferring case to another court.
VSRS Sklep I R 195/2024
Appeal dismissed; mere acquaintance between lawyer and judge does not prove bias under ZPP Art. 67.
Sklep I R 135/2005
Supreme Court rejects delegation request due to procedural conclusion and principle of economic efficiency.
Sklep I R 19/2000
Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction due to former extramarital partner relationship as no impartiality issue exists.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlogu se u g o d i in se za odločanje v tej zadevi določi stvarno pristojno O. s. v Š. pri C..

[JEDRO]

Zunajzakonsko razmerje med obdolžencem in delavko sodišča, ki naj bi mu sodilo, je tehtni razlog za prenos krajevne pristojnosti na drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predstojnica predlagajočega sodišča je predlagala prenos krajevne pristojnosti na drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, saj je obdolženi D. I.zunajzakonski partner delavke na tem sodišču F. B.. Predlog je utemeljen. Razmerje med obdolžencem in delavko O. s. v Š. pri J. je po mnenju višjega sodišča tehtni razlog za prenos krajevne pristojnosti. Zato je predlogu ugodilo in določilo za sojenje v tej zadevi O.s.v Š. pri C., ki je tudi najbližje okrajno sodišče in zato stroški kazenskega postopka ne bodo bistveno višji. Opomba: Zoper ta sklep ni pritožbe (III. odstavek 35. člena ZKP)Đ