Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSL sklep II Cpg 350/2000 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:II.CPG.350.2000 Generato dall'IA

Appeal allowed; partial withdrawal of enforcement request in different case invalidates first-instance dismissal.

Numero d'incarto VSL sklep II Cpg 350/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court granted the creditor's appeal, vacating the first-instance decision that had dismissed the enforcement request. The creditor argued that a partial withdrawal of the enforcement proposal was mistakenly treated as a total withdrawal, while the opposing party contended the procedural record supported the dismissal. The court ruled that since the withdrawal applied to a separate enforcement case, the first-instance ruling was erroneous and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 15 of the Enforcement and Security of Creditor's Rights Act; Article 380(3) of the Civil Procedure Act: A partial withdrawal of an enforcement request in a different case does not constitute a total withdrawal, rendering a dismissal based on such a premise invalid.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
enforcement request withdrawal partial withdrawal validity separate enforcement case procedural error review remand for further proceedings status giuridico anteriore procedura di revisione riapertura della pratica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 15 of the Enforcement and Security of Creditor's Rights Act
Article 380(3) of the Civil Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
VSL sklep II Cpg 1256/99
Appeal allowed: First instance court erred by annulling a final enforcement order when creditor only suspended execution.
VSL sodba I Cp 2015/2004
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove payment was a transfer of debt, not a new payment.
VSL sklep III Cp 1694/99
Appeal dismissed; execution order based on 1978 Enforcement Act remains valid under transitional rules.
VSL sklep I Cpg 714/2011
Appeal dismissed; public notice of service by post constitutes valid service under ZPP.
VSL sklep I Cpg 219/2007
Appeal granted; arbitration clause deemed non-exclusive as it explicitly retained court jurisdiction.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pritožbi se ugodi, izpodbijani sklep se razveljavi in zadeva vrne sodišču prve stopnje v nadaljnji postopek.

[JEDRO]

Iz podatkov v spisu izhaja, da upnik v obravnavani izvršilni zadevi ni v celoti umaknil svojega predloga za izvršbo, saj takega umika v spisu ni, je le umik izvršilnega predloga, ki ga je v izvršilni zadevi opr. št. Ig 98/07444 poslal upnik M... d.o.o. Ker je evidentno, da gre za umik v povsem drugi zadevi, je izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje napačen.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je z izpodbijanim sklepom v celoti razveljavilo sklep o izvršbi opr. št. Ig 96/15356 z dne 13.11.1996 in ustavilo postopek.

Upnik se je zoper sklep pravočasno pritožil in navedel, da ni v celoti umaknil predloga za izvršbo in je očitno prišlo do pomote, zato predlaga razveljavitev napadenega sklepa.

Pritožba je utemeljena.

Iz podatkov v spisu izhaja, da upnik v obravnavani izvršilni zadevi ni v celoti umaknil svojega predloga za izvršbo, saj takega umika v spisu ni. Je le delni umik z dne 6.10.1997, ki ga je sodišče upoštevalo s sklepom o delni ustavitvi z dne 3.12.1998, ter umik izvršilnega predloga, ki ga je v izvršilni zadevi opr. št. Ig 98/07444 poslal upnik M... d.o.o. (list. št. 9). Ker je evidentno, da gre za umik v povsem drugi zadevi, je izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje napačen, zato je sodišče druge stopnje na podlagi 3. točke 380. čl. Zakona o pravdnem postopku v zvezi s 15. čl. Zakona o izvršbi in zavarovanju upnikovi pritožbi ugodilo, izpodbijani sklep razveljavilo in zadevo vrnilo sodišču prve stopnje v nadaljnji postopek.