Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cp 90/00 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:2000:I.CP.90.00 Generato dall'IA

Court accepts withdrawal of appeal filed after first-instance judgment was delivered to second-instance court.

Numero d'incarto VSL sklep I Cp 90/00
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The second-instance court accepted the appellant's withdrawal of their appeal after the first-instance judgment had already been formally delivered to the appellate court. The appellant had initially requested a mortgage registration for a bank's claim but subsequently withdrew the appeal on February 3, 2000. The court ruled that under the relevant procedural law, a party may withdraw an appeal at any time before the second-instance court issues its final decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

ZPP 349. člen 2. odst. 3; Stranka lahko umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
withdrawal of appeal second instance court procedural law mortgage registration civil procedure contratto di deposito bancario diritto bancario spese bancarie

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
2. odst. 349. člena ZPP
Generato dall'IA
VSL Sklep I Cpg 265/2023
Appeal dismissed; objective financial distress alone does not prove subjective danger for interim security order.
VSL Sklep I Cpg 36/2020
Appeal dismissed; court upheld provisional order against asset transfer due to contract invalidation.
VSL sklep I Cp 1182/2013
Appeal dismissed; prior order revoked because debt already secured by mortgage on debtor's property under ZIZ Art. 264(1)2.
VSL sklep II Ip 2325/2014
Appeal dismissed; pre-attachment order denied due to lack of evidence of asset insufficiency and necessity for multiple orders.
VSL sklep I Cpg 713/2011
Appeal dismissed; defendant's specific defenses prevent presumption of debt existence under enforcement law.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Umik pritožbe se sprejme.

[JEDRO]

Ker je pritožnica pred odločanjem sodišča druge stopnje umaknila pritožbo, ko je bil spis že predložen pritožbenemu sodišču, je le-to s sklepom odločilo, da se umik pritožbe sprejme.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je zahtevo upnika, da Okrajno sodišče v Kočevju odredi vknjižbo zastavne pravice za denarno terjatev banke X. ..., v višini 140,000.000,00 SIT s pripadki, pri vl. št. 1806 in 1850 k.o. ..., zavrnilo.

Proti sklepu se je pritožila upnica, ki je predlagala spremembo sklepa in ugoditev njenemu predlogu, da se v zemljiški knjigi Okrajnega sodišča v Kočevju pri vl. št. 1806 in 1850 k.o. ... vknjiži zastavno pravico v njeno korist. Upnica je dne 3.2.2000 umaknila svojo pritožbo, ki jo je vložila 14.1.2000 zoper izpodbijani sklep, opr. št. R 247/98-10, kar je pritožbeno sodišče vzelo na znanje in umik pritožbe sprejelo, saj glede na določbo drugega odst. 349. člena ZPP lahko stranka umakne že vloženo pritožbo, dokler sodišče druge stopnje ne izda odločbe.