Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSL sklep I Cp 1811/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:I.CP.1811.99 Generato dall'IA

Appeal dismissed as filed after expiration of 15-day statutory limitation period under ZPP.

Numero d'incarto VSL sklep I Cp 1811/99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because it was filed after the expiration of the 15-day limitation period. The appellant's lawyer received the first-instance judgment on August 17, 1999, but submitted the appeal on September 6, 1999, missing the deadline. The court ruled that appeals must be rejected as untimely when filed beyond the statutory period prescribed by the Civil Procedure Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

348. člen ZPP; 358. člen ZPP: Appeals filed after the expiration of the statutory limitation period must be rejected as untimely.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
statutory limitation period civil procedure act untimely appeal preclusive deadline court of appeal firma individuale diritto per sé stante e permanente duplica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
348. člen ZPP
358. člen ZPP
Generato dall'IA
VDSS sklep Pdp 1133/2013
Appeal dismissed because a judgment served on the first day of court holidays starts the appeal clock the next day.
VSL sklep II Cp 44/2012
Appeal allowed; payment of court fee installments is not a prerequisite for hearing the appeal.
VDSS sklep Pdp 1134/2013
Appeal dismissed because the appeal was filed after the statutory deadline expired. The court confirmed the first-instance court's decision. The appeal was rejected as untimely. The court ruled the appeal was filed too late. The appeal was rejected due to procedural timeliness. The appeal was dismissed for being untimely. The appeal was rejected as it was filed after the deadline. The appeal was dismissed because it was filed too late. The appeal was rejected due to the expiration of the appeal period.
Sklep X Ips 234/2007
Supreme Court dismisses review appeal by non-lawyer client lacking standing under administrative litigation law.
VSL sklep I Cp 1537/2015
Appeal allowed: joint co-plaintiffs pay one appeal fee collectively despite separate filings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Ker je stranka vložila pritožbo po preteku 15-dnevnega prekluzivnega roka, je bilo treba pritožbo zavreči kot prepozno.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je izdalo sodbo na podlagi pripoznave in sodbo, oboje z dne 13.7.1999. Prvotožena stranka ima v zadevi odvetnika (pooblastilo priloga B1), zato mu je sodišče prve stopnje vročilo odločbo. Pooblaščenec prvotožene stranke je odločbo prejel 17.8.1999 (povratnica pripeta k sodbi). Drugotožena stranka je sama vložila pritožbo. Pritožba je oddana priporočeno na pošti 6.9.1999 (primerjaj kuverto pripeto k pritožbi), kar je vse prispelo na sodišče 7.9.1999. Ker je bila pošta oddana po preteku prekluzivnega 15-dnevnega roka (348. čl.

ZPP), je prepozna. Prepozno pritožbo pa mora pritožbeno sodišče zavreči (358. čl. ZPP).