Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSL sklep II Cp 1555/99 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1999:II.CP.1555.99 Generato dall'IA

Appeal withdrawn by parties; second instance court accepts withdrawal by ruling on notice.

Numero d'incarto VSL sklep II Cp 1555/99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The second instance court accepted the withdrawal of the appeal by a ruling on notice. The defendants had filed an appeal against the first instance judgment ordering them to pay damages and legal costs, but they completely withdrew the appeal via a filing dated October 22, 1999. The court ruled that because the first instance court had not yet issued a final decision, the withdrawal was validly accepted under the relevant procedural code.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

2. odstavek 349. člen ZPP; If a party withdraws an appeal before the second instance court issues a ruling, the court must accept the withdrawal by a ruling on notice.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
withdrawal of appeal second instance procedure ruling on notice procedural code appeal dismissal soddisfacimento del credito solvibilità comprovata obbligo di pagamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
2. odstavek 349. člen ZPP
Generato dall'IA
VSL sodba I Cpg 1196/98
Appeal dismissed; claimant failed to prove debt amount or new facts after main hearing in commercial proceedings.
VSC sodba Cp 459/2012
Appeal dismissed; contract annex purpose determines performance time when deadline is unspecified.
VDS sodba Pdp 1562/99
Appeal dismissed: Employee denied non-compete damages for immediately starting identical business after employment ended.
VSL sodba II Cp 412/2009
Appeal dismissed; court upheld liability for road maintenance and insurance denial due to delayed police report.
Sodba II Ips 391/2009
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses appeal as facts are bound by lower court's trial findings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Umik pritožbe se sprejme na znanje.

[JEDRO]

Če stranka umakne pritožbo, to dejstvo sodišče druge stopnje s sklepom sprejme na znanje, če pred tem še ni izdalo odločbe.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

S sodbo z dne 8.6.1999, opr. št. II P 804/95 je sodišče prve stopnje naložilo toženima strankama, da sta nerazdelno dolžni plačati tožeči stranki znesek 110.111,60 DEM v tolarski protivrednosti in z zamudnimi obrestmi. Hkrati je zavrnilo pobotni ugovor toženih strank in obenem jima je naložilo, da sta nerazdelno dolžni plačati tožeči stranki stroške pravdnega postopka v znesku 179.904,00 SIT.

Proti tej sodbi sta toženi stranki vložili pritožbo, vendar sta jo z vlogo z dne 22.10.1999 v celoti umaknili. Dejstvo, da sta toženi stranki umaknili pritožbo, je sodišču druge stopnje narekovalo, da je s tem sklepom sprejelo umik pritožbe na znanje (2. odstavek 349. člena ZPP).