Appeal dismissed because third-party intervenent filed late, missing the deadline applicable to the joined party.
Slovenia (SI)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appeal filed by a third-party intervenent was rejected because it was submitted after the statutory deadline. The intervenent filed the appeal on January 18, 1995, whereas the deadline expired on January 12, 1995, following the service of the contested judgment to the joined party on December 28, 1994. The court ruled that an intervenent must file appeals within the same time limits applicable to the party they joined, thereby upholding the procedural dismissal.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA1. odstavek 208. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; 358/2 in 367/1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku: A third-party intervenent must file an appeal within the time limit applicable to the party they joined, and failure to do so results in the dismissal of the appeal.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Pritožba se zavrže.
[JEDRO]
Stranski intervenient mora vložiti pritožbo v roku, v katerem bi jo lahko vložila stranka, kateri se je pridružil.
[OBRAZLOŽITEV]
Izpodbijano sodbo je tožena stranka prejela dne 28.12.1994. Pritožbeni rok je tako iztekel dne 12.1.1995. Stranski intervenient je pritožbo vložil 18.1.1995. Ta pritožba je prepozna. Po določbi 1. odstavka 208. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku mora intervenient sprejeti pravdo v tistem stanju, v katerem je, ko stopi vanjo. V nadaljnjem teku pravde ima pravico podajati predloge in opravljati vsa druga pravdna dejanja v rokih, v katerih bi to lahko storila stranka, kateri se je pridružil. To torej pomeni, da mora tudi pritožbo vložiti v roku, ki velja za stranko.
Tako je pritožbeno sodišče pritožbo zavrglo po členu 358/2 v zvezi s členom 367/1 Zakona o pravdnem postopku.