Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSL sklep II Cp 44/95 ECLI:SI:VSLJ:1995:II.CP.44.95 Generato dall'IA

Appeal dismissed because court settlement is not a judicial decision and cannot be appealed.

Numero d'incarto VSL sklep II Cp 44/95
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court rejected the appeal filed by the first plaintiff against a verified court settlement. The plaintiff claimed uncertainty regarding whether the settlement had been amended, yet the court found the settlement valid and binding. Since a court settlement is not a judicial decision under the Code of Civil Procedure, it cannot be challenged via appeal, leading to the dismissal of the complaint.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Articles 321 and 322 of the Code of Civil Procedure; A court settlement is not a judicial decision and therefore cannot be appealed under Articles 348 and 378 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
court settlement judicial decision appeal admissibility Code of Civil Procedure verified transcript revisione processuale revisione delle prestazioni d'invalidità modifica di misure cautelari

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Articles 321 and 322 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Articles 348 and 378 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Article 367 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Generato dall'IA
VSL sklep I Cpg 1181/2000
Appeal allowed; first-instance judgment voided for lack of reasoning violating procedural rules.
Sodba in sklep II Ips 385/2005
Appeal dismissed; review rejected for non-final judgment and lack of capacity or poverty grounds.
VSL sklep I Cp 1665/98
Appeal allowed; court settlement voidable due to changed circumstances under ZOR 133.1 and ZPP 370.1.
VDS sodba in sklep Pdp 31/2006
Appeal partially allowed; settlement rescinded due to fraud and misrepresentation regarding reintegration meaning.
VSL sklep I Cpg 131/99
Appeal allowed; withdrawal of lawsuit nine months after debt recognition precludes cost exemption. Withdrawal of lawsuit nine months after debt recognition precludes cost exemption.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pritožba se zavrže.

[JEDRO]

Ker sodna poravnava ni sodna odločba, je ni mogoče izpodbijati s pritožbo.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim overjenim prepisom sodne poravnave (popravkom sodne poravnave) sta se toženca po nasprotni tožbi (M. in Z. Š.) zavezala plačati tožeči stranki po nasprotni tožbi (Z.) znesek 5.000,00 SIT skupaj z zakonitimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 31.1.1986 do plačila v 15 dneh, s čemer so poravnane vse medsebojne obveznosti strank vključno z že pravnomočno prisojenimi, a še neplačanimi stroški v tej zadevi.

Zoper to procesno dejanje se pritožuje prvi tožnik in zatrjuje, da mu ni znano, ali je bila sodna poravnava popravljena. Prejel je le predlog tožene stranke za popravek sodne poravnave, na katerega je posredovala sporni odgovor, zato tožnika v celoti vztrajata na sodni poravnavi, ki je bila sklenjena dne 21.4.1994. Pritožba ni dovoljena.

Ker sodna poravnava ni sodna odločba (321. in 322. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku - v nadaljevanju ZPP), je ni mogoče izpodbijati s pritožbo (348. člen in 378. člen ZPP). To velja tudi za overjen prepis zapisnika, v katerem je vpisana poravnava. Pritožbeno sodišče je zato pritožbo zavrglo kot nedovoljeno (367. člen ZPP).