Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep I R 102/2005 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2005:I.R.102.2005 Generato dall'IA

Court rejects delegation of jurisdiction request as personal conflict probability does not automatically trigger Article 67 ZPP.

Numero d'incarto Sklep I R 102/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request to delegate jurisdiction to a different court under Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act. The applicant argued that a specific judge should recuse herself due to past professional collaboration with the defendant, creating a personal conflict. The court held that the mere probability of such a conflict within a single court's department does not automatically necessitate a transfer of jurisdiction to another court. Consequently, the request was dismissed because the statutory threshold for delegation was not met by the circumstances described.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; The probability of a judge's recusal within a specific court's department does not automatically constitute a ground for determining a different competent court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
delegation of jurisdiction personal conflict recusal of judge competent court Civil Procedure Act judicial independence procedural efficiency concordato stragiudiziale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
Sklep I R 50/2006
Supreme Court transfers case to another court due to potential bias from a judge's familial ties and dual role.
VSRS Sklep I R 155/2021
Supreme Court transfers jurisdiction to ensure impartiality when creditor's brother works at the same court as enforcement officer.
VSRS Sklep III R 34/2016
Appeal dismissed: Same judge leading bankruptcy and related litigation does not automatically violate impartiality rights.
VSRS Sklep I R 51/2024
Supreme Court transfers civil case jurisdiction from Ljubljana to Celje due to perceived lack of impartiality.
VSM Sklep I Kr 65979/2019
Court transfers criminal case to different district court due to perceived lack of judicial impartiality.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Verjetnost, da bo predlagana izločitev sodnikov posameznega oddelka določenega sodišča, praviloma ne predstavlja predpostavke za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča po 67. členu ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Okrajno sodišče v A. je predlagalo "delegacijo pristojnosti po 67. členu ZPP", ker je tožena stranka višja sodnica Višjega sodišča v A. in je nekoč delala na pravdnem oddelku tedanjega Temeljnega sodišča v A., Enote v A., zaradi česar so nekateri sodniki pravdnega oddelka Okrajnega sodišča v A. z njo sodelovali. Sodnica je tudi sodelovala v projektu reševanja sodnih zaostankov na pravdnem oddelku predlagatelja, nekateri na oddelku zaposleni sodniki pa jo poznajo, ker so delali kot strokovni sodelavci na Višjem sodišču v A. Zaradi navedenih okoliščin bi zato sodniki pravdnega oddelka predlagatelja lahko predlagali svojo izločitev. Stališče predlagatelja je, da bi se postopek očitno opravil lažje in hitreje, če bi bila zadeva delegirana drugemu sodišču.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Verjetnost, da bo predlagana izločitev sodnikov posameznega oddelka določenega sodišča, praviloma ne predstavlja predpostavke za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča po 67. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku. Posebej to velja za sodišča z relativno velikim številom sodnikov, torej tudi za Okrajno sodišče v A.