Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
5775-25 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court grants review of lower court's refusal to issue review permission for personal assistance rights case.

Numero d'incarto 5775-25
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svezia (SE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court granted review permission regarding whether the district court should have issued review permission in a personal assistance rights case. The applicant argued that the district court incorrectly denied the procedural step necessary to challenge the refusal of personal assistance. The court decided to allow the review because the lower court's decision on procedural standing required further examination by the Supreme Court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 28 kap. 10 a. justitielagen; The Supreme Court may grant review permission when a lower court's decision on the necessity of review permission involves a question of law or fact of general importance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
review permission personal assistance rights procedural standing Supreme Court administrative review perizia medica aggiornata necessità di cure mediche revisione delle prestazioni d'invalidità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 28 kap. 10 a. justitielagen
Generato dall'IA
2136-02
Appeal on social assistance under Social Services Act is limited to legality review under Municipal Code.
4716-25
HFD allows appeal on ECHR compatibility of mandatory medication decisions lacking judicial review.
2060-22
Social insurance agency allowed to re-assess assistance hours based on new case law despite prior approval.
Ö 4050-03
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against granting leave to appeal, ruling it lacks legal force for domvilla claims.
3281-18
Supreme Administrative Court rules retroactive reporting requirement applies only to pending applications, not post-decision court review periods.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Den fråga i målet som har lett till att Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen meddelat prövningstillstånd är om kammarrätten borde ha meddelat prövningstillstånd i ett mål om rätt till personlig assistans (mål nr 5775-25, Kammarrätten i Göteborgs mål nr 2989-25).