Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
PMÖ 456-26 Generato dall'IA

Consumer Ombudsman lacks standing to appeal state-funded litigation cost awards against private parties.

Numero d'incarto PMÖ 456-26
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svezia (SE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the Consumer Ombudsman's appeal regarding its standing to challenge a private party's award of litigation costs funded by the state. The Ombudsman argued it should have the right to contest the allocation of public funds for legal expenses. The court held that the Ombudsman is not a proper party to such proceedings as it lacks a direct legal interest in the specific cost allocation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Chapter 10 § 1 and Chapter 10 § 2 of the Code of Judicial Procedure; The Consumer Ombudsman lacks standing to appeal decisions on litigation costs awarded to private parties when those costs are to be reimbursed from state funds.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Consumer Ombudsman standing litigation cost allocation state funded expenses procedural standing judicial cost reimbursement rimborso delle spese partecipazione alle spese dell'assicurato ripetibili

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Chapter 10 § 1 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Chapter 10 § 2 of the Code of Judicial Procedure
Generato dall'IA
ÖM 16716-24
Court dismisses claim for opponent's costs when plaintiff fails to meet procedural prerequisites for exception.
ÖF 2760-25
Court awards partial legal costs to the party requesting remand due to agency errors.
Ö 583-97
Swedish Supreme Court dismisses bankruptcy administrator's claim for court costs as no legal basis exists under the Bankruptcy Act.
P 16631-25
Court dismisses legal costs claim where plaintiffs initiated proceedings without sufficient grounds but without obvious lack of basis.
A 194-01
Arbetsdomstolen dismisses the case after the plaintiff withdrew the lawsuit, ordering them to pay the union's legal costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

I målet aktualiseras frågan om Konsumentombudsmannen har rätt att överklaga ett beslut avseende att motparten tillerkänts ersättning för rättegångskostnader när kostnaderna ska ersättas av staten (i form av allmänna medel). (Svea hovrätt, Patent- och marknadsöverdomstolen, mål PMÄ 15945-25)