Patent novelty found due to functional distinction between claimed beam element and known technology.
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Patent Court of Sweden granted the request for novelty under Section 2(1) of the Patent Act. The applicant argued that their long beam element with specific stress-relieving zones differed functionally from known technology lacking such features. The court determined novelty existed because the functional determination of the claimed element distinguished it from the prior art.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IASection 2(1) of the Patent Act; Novelty is established when a functional distinction separates the claimed invention from known technology, as demonstrated by the specific stress-relieving zone in the beam element absent in prior art.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
Fråga om nyhet enligt 2 § 1 st patentlagen. Nyhet har ansetts föreligga då en funktionell bestämning skiljer ett uppfunnet bärelement för uppbärning av byggskivor från känd teknik. Det långsträckta bärelementet omfattar ett liv och två sidoflänsar, varvid livet uppvisar radvisa formförändringar som bildar en spänningsutjämnande zon. De kända bärelementen saknar uppgift om någon spänningsutjämning.