HFD allows appeal regarding whether seasonal gaps in dispatch constitute sending out to replace another person.

The Supreme Administrative Court granted permission to appeal a decision concerning whether a seasonal gap in dispatch constitutes sending out to replace another person. The applicant argued that the interruption between dispatches meant the individual was not sent out to replace anyone, while the opposing party contended the seasonal nature did not negate the replacement status. The court decided to allow the appeal to examine the specific circumstances of the seasonal work pattern and the continuity of the replacement duty.