Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ICCJ_86957 Generato dall'IA

Preliminary ruling referral on restitution law interplay rejected as inadmissible.

Numero d'incarto ICCJ_86957
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Romania (RO)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice rejected as inadmissible the referral from the Court of Appeal of Iași seeking a preliminary ruling on the interpretation and application of Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 31, 33, and 35 of Law No. 165/2013, as amended, in relation to Laws No. 10/2001 and No. 247/2005 regarding restitution of property in cases pending before courts. The referral was dismissed as inadmissible, meaning the lower court's request for a preliminary ruling was not accepted on procedural grounds. The dispute involved a request for clarification on how the 2013 restitution framework law interacts with earlier restitution laws in pending cases. The decisive legal basis was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral under the rules governing preliminary rulings, specifically failing to meet the admissibility criteria for such referrals, with the decision rendered binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010).

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013; Preliminary ruling referral on restitution law interplay rejected as inadmissible: 165/2013, as amended, in relation to Laws No. 10/2001 and No. 247/2005 regarding restitution of property in cases pending before courts. The referral was dismissed as inadmissible, meaning the lower court's request for a preliminary ruling was not accepted on procedural grounds. The dispute involved a request for clarification on how the 2013 restitution framework law interacts with earlier restitution laws in pending cases. The decisive legal basis was the procedural inadmissibility of the referral under the rules governing preliminary rulings, specifically failing to meet the admissibility criteria for such referrals, with the decision rendered binding pursuant to Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code (Law No. 134/2010).

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedimento pregiudiziale restituzione della proprietà decisione pregiudiziale motivi di cassazione interpretazione delle leggi articolo del CPC

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013
33, art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013 cu modificările si completările ulterioare, pentru cauzele aflate pe rolul instanţelor, raportat la dispoziţiile Legii nr.
Generato dall'IA
ICCJ_156003
Preliminary property-restitution referral dismissed as inadmissible; deadlines left uninterpreted
ICCJ_140169
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible; courts cannot substitute judgment for restitution order under Law 165/2013.
ICCJ_187724
Restitution referral on Law 165/2013 valuation held inadmissible.
ICCJ_201038
Preliminary ruling referral inadmissible for lacking genuine interpretive difficulty; prior land restitution decisions stand.
ICCJ_155123
Inadmissibility of preliminary ruling request on restitution priority and compulsory land compensation under Law 165/2013

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedura civila adoptat prin Legea nr. 134/2010

Declared the referral binding and mandatory for the courts.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

ROMÂNIA

ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE SI JUSTIŢIE

Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept

Minuta deciziei nr. 8 Dosar nr. 6/1/2014/HP/C

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

DECIDE:

Respinge ca inadmisibila sesizarea formulată de Curtea de Apel Iaşi, în dosarul nr. 11361/99/2011*, privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare si aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 4, art. 5, art. 6, art. 7, art. 8, art. 9, art. 11, art. 12, art. 14, art. 16, art. 17, art. 20, art. 21, art. 22, art. 24, art. 25, art. 27, art. 31, art. 33, art. 35 din Legea nr. 165/2013 cu modificările si completările ulterioare, pentru cauzele aflate pe rolul instanţelor, raportat la dispoziţiile Legii nr. 10/2001 republicata, cu modificările si completările ulterioare si ale Legii nr. 247/2005 cu modificările si completările ulterioare.

Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. (3) din Codul de procedura civila adoptat prin Legea nr. 134/2010.

Pronunţata în ședința publică, astăzi 7 iulie 2014.