Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
316/02 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional court dismisses appeal for hearing due to evident lack of appeal prerequisites under Article 70 of Law 28/82.

Numero d'incarto 316/02
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Portogallo (PT)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court ordered the appellant to be heard regarding the evident lack of appeal prerequisites under Article 70 of Law 28/82. The appellant challenged the Public Prosecutor's opinion that the appeal was manifestly unfounded, arguing for a full review of the case. The court decided to proceed with the hearing to determine if the appeal actually meets the necessary legal requirements before any substantive judgment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 70(1)(b) of Law 28/82; The Constitutional Court may order the appellant to be heard when the Public Prosecutor's opinion suggests a lack of appeal prerequisites, pending a final determination on the admissibility of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Constitutional Appeal Appeal Prerequisites Public Prosecutor Opinion Law 28/82 Hearing Order Manifestly Unfounded Admissibility Review procedure di ricorso

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 70(1)(b) of Law 28/82
Generato dall'IA
571/15.7T8EVR-A.E1.S1
Supreme Court allows review of a precautionary order appeal due to contradiction with its own prior rulings.
326/2019
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses nullity claim against prior non-knowledge decision as procedurally infounded.
57/23
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses admissibility due to lack of specific constitutional norm citation in prior proceedings.
997/17
Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of prior adequate invocation of constitutional question.
923/09
Portuguese Constitutional Court dismisses appeal for lack of prior constitutional and illegality challenge. The court rejects the claim that the lower court's reasoning was different. The applicant failed to meet the procedural requirement of raising the issue beforehand.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Acórdão 354/02

ACÓRDÃO Nº 354/02

Processo nº 316/02

2ª secção

Acordam, em conferência, na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional

Nos presentes autos, vindos do Tribunal da Relação de Évora, em que é reclamante A, face ao Parecer do Ministério Público, no sentido da "evidente inverificação dos pressupostos do recurso tipificado na alínea b) do nº1 do art. 70º da Lei nº 28/82", e porque eventualmente poder-se-á entender que é manifestamente infundado aquele recurso, decide-se mandar ouvir o reclamante sobre toda essa matéria, para se pronunciar, querendo.

Lisboa, 15 de Julho de 2002

Guilherme da Fonseca

Paulo Mota Pinto

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa