Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
333/95 Generato dall'IA

Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law against challenge citing prior precedent and lack of unconstitutionality.

Numero d'incarto 333/95
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Portogallo (PT)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Constitutional Court dismissed the appeal challenging the constitutionality of the conscientious objection exemption clause. The appellant argued the specific legal provision violated constitutional rights, relying on previous rulings that established the framework for such exemptions. The court determined the norm was not unconstitutional by affirming its consistency with existing constitutional principles and prior case law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 18.º n.º 3, alínea d) da Lei nº 7/92; The specific exemption for conscientious objection does not violate constitutional guarantees when aligned with established judicial precedent and the principle of proportionality.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
Conscientious Objection Constitutional Review Legal Proportionality Constitutional Rights Judicial Precedent Constitutional Court Appeal Dismissal cognizione del ricorso per cassazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 18.º n.º 3, alínea d) da Lei nº 7/92

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Acórdão na 681/95
Generato dall'IA
195/96
Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law as constitutional and rejects applicant's challenge.
136/96
Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law as constitutional, rejecting challenge to its validity.
498/95
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law as constitutional and rejects the objection's appeal.
135/96
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law against constitutional challenge.
41/96
Portuguese Constitutional Court upholds conscientious objection law requiring explicit declaration for civic service. The court rejects the challenge to the statutory requirement for an explicit statement of availability. The decision confirms the constitutionality of the specific clause demanding an express declaration. The ruling affirms the existing precedent established in a previous full court session. The court denies the appeal based on the established legal interpretation of the statute. The judgment maintains the requirement for explicit availability for alternative service. The outcome validates the legislative framework for conscientious objection procedures. The decision reinforces the procedural necessity of written declarations. The court concludes that the norm does not violate constitutional principles.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Acórdão 232/96

ACÓRDÃO Nº 232/96

Processo nº 333/95

2ª Secção

Relator: Conselheiro Luís Nunes de Almeida

Acordam na 2ª Secção do Tribunal Constitucional:

Recorrente: A.

Recorrida: Comissão Nacional de Objecção de Consciência

Nestes autos de recurso, tendo por objecto a norma da alínea d) do nº 3 do artigo 18º da Lei nº 7/92, de 12 de Maio, seguindo na esteira do acórdão na 681/95, tirado em Plenário e publicado no Diário da República, II série, de 30 de Janeiro de 1996, decide-se pela não inconstitucionalidade da norma em causa e nega-se provimento ao recurso.

Lisboa, 28 de Fevereiro de 1996

Luís Nunes de Almeida

Messias Bento

Bravo Serra

Guilherme da Fonseca

José Manuel Cardoso da Costa