Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V KK 395/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed criminal appeal as obviously groundless regarding attempted theft and other charges.

Numero d'incarto V KK 395/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal as obviously groundless, upholding the lower court's conviction. The defendant was convicted of attempted theft and other offenses by the District Court, prompting a cassation request by the defense lawyer. The court rejected the appeal because the arguments presented did not meet the threshold for cassation review under Polish criminal procedure law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 400 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 401 § 1 k.p.k.: A cassation appeal is dismissed as obviously groundless when the challenged judgment is based on correct application of law and facts, and the appeal fails to demonstrate any of the statutory grounds for cassation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal obviously groundless attempted theft criminal procedure Supreme Court dismissal of appeal costs of proceedings

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 400 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 401 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 263 § 2 k.k
G.skazanego z art. 263 § 2 k.k.
art. 535 § 3 k.p.k
po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu w trybie art. 535 § 3 k.p.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KK 395/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 sierpnia 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jarosław Matras w sprawie D. G.skazanego z art. 263 § 2 k.k. i in. po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu w trybie art. 535 § 3 k.p.k. w dniu 28 sierpnia 2019 r. kasacji wniesionej przez obrońcę skazanego od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w K.z dnia 28 marca 2019 r., sygn. akt V Ka […]utrzymującego w mocy wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w K.z dnia 30 października 2018 r., sygn. akt II K […] p o s t a n o w i ł: 1. oddalić kasację, jako oczywiście bezzasadną; 2. obciążyć skazanego kosztami sądowymi postępowania kasacyjnego.