Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V KK 368/18 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses cassation against robbery conviction as obviously groundless and orders costs against defendants.

Numero d'incarto V KK 368/18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeals filed by the defense attorneys as obviously groundless. The defendants were convicted under Article 286 § 1 of the Criminal Code for robbery following a trial before the District Court and subsequent appeal. The court rejected the arguments because the lower court's findings of fact were sufficient and the legal application was correct, rendering the appeals without merit.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 k.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.k.: Cassation appeals are dismissed as obviously groundless when the lower court's decision is based on established facts and correct legal reasoning, leaving no room for reasonable doubt regarding the conviction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal dismissal obviously groundless robbery conviction Article 286 Criminal Code costs allocation

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 k.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KK 368/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 7 listopada 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Świecki (przewodniczący, sprawozdawca)‎SSN Marek Pietruszyński‎SSN Zbigniew PuszkarskiProtokolant Katarzyna Wełpa przy udziale prokuratora Prokuratury Krajowej Grzegorza Krysmanna,‎w sprawie R. D., J. M. i N. Z.skazanych z art. 286 § 1 kk‎po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na rozprawie‎w dniu 7 listopada 2019 r.,‎kasacji wniesionych przez obrońców skazanych‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 27 grudnia 2017 r., sygn. akt II AKa […]‎zmieniającego wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Ś.‎z dnia 30 grudnia 2016 r., sygn. akt III K […], 1. oddala kasacje jako oczywiście bezzasadne, 2. kosztami sądowymi postępowania kasacyjnego obciąża skazanych w częściach na nich przypadających.