V KK 355/19 Generato dall'IA

Supplementary private prosecution appeal dismissed due to lack of standing and defendant acquittal.

Numero d'incarto V KK 355/19

Autorità giudiziaria Sąd Najwyższy

Giurisdizione

Polonia (PL)

Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by supplementary private prosecutors regarding a criminal case involving financial fraud. The court found that the plaintiffs lacked standing to file a supplementary prosecution because the lower prosecutor's decision to terminate the investigation had not been properly challenged twice as required by law. Furthermore, since the defendants were acquitted in the first instance and the acquittal was upheld on appeal, the court could not rule against them, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 531 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 529 k.p.k.; Art. 17 § 1 pkt 9 k.p.k.: A supplementary private prosecution appeal is inadmissible if the plaintiff lacks standing due to procedural defects in initiating the prosecution, or if the case has already resulted in an acquittal that cannot be overturned.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

supplementary private prosecution lack of standing procedural defect acquittal finality inadmissible appeal criminal procedure code termination of proceedings querela

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

art. 531 § 1 k.p.k.

art. 529 k.p.k.

art. 17 § 1 pkt 9 k.p.k.

art. 637a k.p.k.

art. 637 k.p.k.

art. 640 k.p.k.

art. 430 k.p.k.

art. 439 § 2 k.p.k.

art. 55 § 1 k.p.k.

art. 531 § 1 k.p.k

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

I KZP 9/00

III KK 371/05

Supreme Court held that the condition for victim's supplementary prosecution requires two dismissal decisions, not specific procedural forms.

IV KK 12/04

IV KK 434/06

Supreme Court dismisses appeal filed against defendants' acquittal due to statute of limitations expiration. The appeal was inadmissible as it sought a less favorable outcome for the accused. The court ruled that appeals against acquittals based on expired statutes are procedurally barred. The appeal was dismissed because it sought a less favorable outcome for the accused, violating procedural bars on appeals against acquittals. The court held that the statute of limitations had expired before the appeal was filed, rendering the appeal inadmissible. The appeal was dismissed because it sought a less favorable outcome for the accused, violating procedural bars on appeals against acquittals. The court held that the statute of limitations had expired before the appeal was filed, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on disadvantage because dismissal for lack of evidence is more favorable than formal dismissal.

Generato dall'IA

Appeal court partially allowed appeal, overturning acquittal on one charge while upholding acquittal on another.

Criminal appeal dismissed; civil claim pursuit cannot constitute fraud under Polish law.

Appeal dismissed; acquittal upheld due to insufficient evidence proving illegal possession of victim's property.

Supreme Court dismisses cassation against acquittal for forgery, upholding free evaluation of evidence and procedural completeness.

Appeal court upheld acquittal for corporate officers, ruling evidence failed to prove criminal intent under Polish Criminal Code.

Testo completo