Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V KK 193/18 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal as obviously unfounded regarding theft conviction and orders defendant to pay costs.

Numero d'incarto V KK 193/18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the defendant's defense attorney as obviously unfounded. The case involved a conviction under Article 286 § 1 of the Criminal Code for theft, following a judgment by the Court of Appeal. The court rejected the appeal without a full review, ruling that the lower court's decision was correct and ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the cassation proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.; Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.k.: The Supreme Court may dismiss a cassation appeal as obviously unfounded if the lower court's decision is clearly erroneous or lacks legal basis, thereby avoiding a full substantive review.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal dismissal obviously unfounded appeal theft conviction Criminal Code Art 286 court costs allocation

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.
Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KK 193/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 16 maja 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Świecki (przewodniczący, sprawozdawca)‎SSN Barbara Skoczkowska‎SSN Małgorzata Wąsek-WiaderekProtokolant Katarzyna Wełpa przy udziale prokuratora Prokuratury Krajowej Grzegorza Krysmanna,‎w sprawie P. K.‎skazanego z art. 286 § 1 kk i inne‎po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na rozprawie‎w dniu 16 maja 2019 r.,‎kasacji, wniesionej przez obrońcę skazanego‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 21 grudnia 2017 r., sygn. akt II AKa […]‎zmieniającego wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w P.‎z dnia 21 lipca 2017 r., sygn. akt XVI K […], 1. oddala kasację jako oczywiście bezzasadną, 2. kosztami sądowymi postępowania kasacyjnego obciąża skazanego.