V KK 158/18
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds, ruling that appellate court did not violate ne peius rule by expanding continuous crime description.
Polonia (PL)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a second-instance judgment that expanded the description of a continuous crime. The prosecution argued this violated the ne peius principle by convicting the defendant for acts previously excluded from the charge. The court ruled that such expansion is permissible within a continuous crime's normative unity and does not constitute a procedural violation.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 454 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 529 k.p.k.: The ne peius rule does not prohibit the appellate court from supplementing the description of a continuous crime with acts previously excluded, provided the normative unity of the crime remains intact.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
continuous crime
ne peius principle
appellate review
procedural dismissal
criminal procedure code
riattivazione del procedimento
sviamento della giustizia
reformatio in peius
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 454 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 529 k.p.k.
Art. 98 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 632 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 17 § 1 pkt 11 k.p.k
art. 529 k.p.k
art. 98 § 2 k.p.k
art. 296 § 1 k.k
art. 12 k.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IAV KK 356/16
Supreme Court dismissed cassation on procedural grounds despite a sentencing calculation error corrected to the defendant's benefit.
II KK 183/14
Supreme Court quashes appeal court verdict for omitting prior acquittal facts violating procedural law.
V KZP 25/90
II KR 33/84
I KZP 15/07
Final conviction for continuous crimes does not bar later prosecution for newly revealed acts within the same continuous act.
I KZP 29/01
Final conviction for continuous crime blocks retrial for later revealed acts under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.
Decisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAIII KS 50/24
Supreme Court dismissed cassation against acquittal, ruling lower court could not convict due to ne bis in idem ban.
V KK 252/24
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for increasing criminal measures from 2 to 3 years without defendant's objection.
IV KK 375/23
Supreme Court dismisses request to suspend execution of criminal judgment due to lack of clear grounds and exceptional consequences.
III KK 202/25
Criminal appeal dismissed because appeal on behalf of convicted person requires imprisonment sentence without probation. Defense failed to prove judge bias.
III KS 3/22
Supreme Court dismissed appeal against cassation ruling for improper use of Art. 437 § 2 CPC to challenge merits.