Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CZ 94/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court corrects a clerical error in a previous ruling regarding the word 'Savings' instead of 'Insolvency'.

Numero d'incarto V CZ 94/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court corrected a clerical error in a prior ruling dated December 18, 2019, by replacing the word 'Insolvency' with 'Savings'. The parties involved were a bank and an individual defendant in a claim for payment. The court exercised its authority to fix obvious writing mistakes without re-examining the merits of the underlying dispute.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

s. 200 ust. 1 k.p.c.; The Supreme Court may correct obvious clerical errors in its own prior rulings to ensure the text accurately reflects the intended legal decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
clerical error correction Supreme Court procedure writing mistake amendment judicial self-correction civil procedure law bank dispute payment claim

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
s. 200 ust. 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CZ 94/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 24 stycznia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Henryk Pietrzkowski (przewodniczący)‎SSN Władysław Pawlak (sprawozdawca)‎SSN Monika Koba w sprawie z powództwa (…) Banku (…) S.A. w W.‎przeciwko D. D.‎o zapłatę,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 24 stycznia 2020 r., prostuje oczywisty błąd pisarski w komparycji postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18 grudnia 2019 r., sygn. akt V CZ 94/19, w ten sposób, że zamiast słowa "Osczędności" wpisuje słowo "Oszczędności". UZASADNIENIE