Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CZ 80/14 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court rejects request to resume previous decision on appeal against non-enforcement order.

Numero d'incarto V CZ 80/14
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's request to resume the previous decision regarding the non-enforcement of a judgment. The applicant, M. S., sought to reopen the case after the Supreme Court had already ruled on the non-enforcement of a lower court's decision. The court determined that the procedural grounds for resumption were not met, as the prior ruling was final and no new circumstances justified reopening the proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may resume a decision only upon proof of new circumstances or error of law, which were not established in this instance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
resumption of proceedings non-enforcement of judgment final decision Supreme Court jurisdiction procedural exhaustion

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 379 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 380 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CZ 80/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 11 sierpnia 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Maria Szulc w sprawie z powództwa S. K. i M. S.‎przeciwko Bankowi Spółce Akcyjnej w K.‎o zapłatę‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 11 sierpnia 2015 r.,‎wniosku powoda M. S. o reasumpcję postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 20 listopada 2014 r., V CZ 80/14 odrzuca wniosek. UZASADNIENIE