Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CZ 11/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court corrects its own ruling to replace 'decision' with 'judgment' due to a clerical error.

Numero d'incarto V CZ 11/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court issued a ruling to correct a clerical error in its previous decision dated March 27, 2019. The original text incorrectly stated that a 'decision' was annulled, whereas the court determined the annulled document was actually a 'judgment'. Consequently, the court amended the text to accurately reflect the legal instrument that was set aside.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 200 § 1 k.p.c.; The Supreme Court may correct obvious clerical errors in its own rulings to ensure the text accurately reflects the intended legal instrument, such as distinguishing between a 'decision' and a 'judgment'.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
clerical error correction self-correction of ruling judgment versus decision obvious clerical mistake procedural amendment

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 200 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CZ 11/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 29 maja 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak (przewodniczący)‎SSN Józef Frąckowiak (sprawozdawca)‎SSN Monika Koba w sprawie z powództwa K. D.‎przeciwko W. P.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 29 maja 2019 r., z urzędu w przedmiocie sprostowania prostuje oczywisty błąd pisarski w postanowieniu Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 27 marca 2019 r., sygn. akt V CZ 11/19 w ten sposób, że w miejsce słów "uchyla zaskarżone postanowienie" wpisuje "uchyla zaskarżony wyrok".