Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 677/14 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine ownership claim against county road authority.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 677/14
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by T. B. against the lower court's decision on ownership. The case involves a dispute between T. B. and the County K. Road Authority regarding the acquisition of land through prescription. The court decided to refer the matter for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision requires further examination of the case facts or legal issues.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal acceptance ownership by prescription road authority dispute Supreme Court review civil procedure law

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 677/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 12 czerwca 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Bogumiła Ustjanicz w sprawie z wniosku B. B. i T. B.‎przy uczestnictwie Powiatu K. - Zarządu Dróg Powiatowych w K.‎o stwierdzenie zasiedzenia,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 12 czerwca 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy T. B.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w Ś.‎z dnia 26 czerwca 2014 r., sygn. akt II Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE