Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CSK 675/14 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court corrects procedural error by adding 'both cassation complaints' to the dismissal order.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 675/14
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court amended its previous ruling to explicitly include 'both cassation complaints' in the section denying their acceptance. The original order omitted this specific phrasing regarding the appellants K. M. and K. D., while the plaintiff S.A. argued for precise statutory compliance. The court corrected the error to ensure the legal record accurately reflects the rejection of all pending appeals.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court must correct procedural errors in its rulings that affect the clarity of the decision regarding the specific complaints being dismissed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation complaints procedural correction Supreme Court ruling omission of parties sentencing amendment

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 675/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 9 lipca 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mirosław Bączyk w sprawie z powództwa K. […] S.A. w P.‎przeciwko W. Sp. z o.o. w W., W. D., K. M. i K. D.‎o zapłatę, na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 9 lipca 2015 r., prostuje sentencję postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 12 czerwca 2015 r, sygn. akt V CSK 675/14, w pkt 1 w ten sposób, że po słowach "odmawia przyjęcia" wstawia zwrot "obu skarg kasacyjnych". UZASADNIENIE