Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 67/17 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses insurance claim for unpaid medical expenses due to procedural defects in the lower court's judgment.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 67/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the insured against the appellate court's judgment. The insured argued that the lower court failed to properly assess the claim for unpaid medical expenses. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the underlying judgment contained procedural errors preventing a valid cassation review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if the judgment under review contains procedural defects that preclude a valid review of the merits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal inadmissibility procedural defects judgment insurance claim dismissal medical expenses dispute Supreme Court review

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 67/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 3 kwietnia 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z powództwa D. R., A. R. i K. R.‎przeciwko S Towarzystwu Ubezpieczeń E. S. A. w S.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 3 kwietnia 2018 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powodów od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we W.‎z dnia 29 września 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa …/16, podejmuje zawieszone postępowanie.