Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 650/14 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal in joint property division case involving hidden assets and tax evasion.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 650/14
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court admitted the cassation appeal for further examination regarding the division of joint property. The applicant argued that the lower court failed to properly assess hidden assets and tax evasion allegations against the spouse. The court accepted the appeal because the lower judgment lacked sufficient reasoning on these critical factual issues.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court admits a cassation appeal when the lower court's judgment is based on a finding of fact that is not supported by evidence or when the court failed to address a crucial issue raised in the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
joint property division cassation appeal admission hidden assets tax evasion evidence insufficient reasoning Supreme Court review family law dispute

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 650/14 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 maja 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Katarzyna Tyczka-Rote w sprawie z wniosku Z. F.‎przy uczestnictwie X. F.‎o podział majątku wspólnego,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 maja 2015 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 17 grudnia 2013 r., sygn. akt II Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE