Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 649/15 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine acquisition of property share via adverse possession.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 649/15
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by participants H. B., I. B., and K. B. against the lower court's decision. The case concerns whether a property share was acquired through adverse possession (prescription) following a specific procedural history involving multiple parties. The court decided to remand the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision concerns the acquisition of property rights through prescription, provided the appeal meets statutory requirements.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
adverse possession prescription of property acquisition of share cassation appeal Supreme Court civil procedure remand for examination

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 2 pkt 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 649/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 22 kwietnia 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Pietrzykowski w sprawie z wniosku M. B.‎przy uczestnictwie A. B., H. B., I. B., K. B., Miasta K., B. Q. i D. S.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia udziału w nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 22 kwietnia 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej uczestników postępowania H. B., I. B. i K. B.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w K.‎z dnia 28 kwietnia 2015 r., sygn. akt IV Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.