Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 43/17 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine boundary between state road and water management authority property.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 43/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by A. W. and R. W. regarding a boundary dispute between state roads and water management authorities. The lower court had previously ruled on the division of land, but the appellants sought further review of the specific demarcation lines. The court decided to proceed with the appeal to resolve the conflicting interpretations of property boundaries.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision concerns the interpretation of law or the application of law in a way that affects the outcome of the case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal acceptance property boundary dispute state road demarcation water management authority civil procedure law

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 43/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 czerwca 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Bogumiła Ustjanicz w sprawie z wniosku A. W. i R. W.‎przy uczestnictwie S. B., J. B., D. K., Województwa […] - Zarządu Dróg Wojewódzkich w […] , Skarbu Państwa - Regionalnego Zarządu Gospodarki Wodnej w […] oraz Skarbu Państwa - Starosty […]‎o rozgraniczenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 21 czerwca 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawców od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w B.‎z dnia 29 września 2016 r., sygn. akt II Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.