Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 365/15 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds due to lack of finality in lower court judgment.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 365/15
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeals filed by both parties regarding a civil dispute over payment. The lower court's judgment was not final because it was subject to further review, preventing the Supreme Court from exercising its jurisdiction. Consequently, the appeals were rejected as inadmissible due to the absence of a binding legal force.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 383 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 384 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may not examine cassation appeals against judgments that have not yet acquired the force of res judicata.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal admissibility force of res judicata procedural prerequisite final judgment requirement civil procedure law

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 383 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 384 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 365/15 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 17 grudnia 2015 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa T. […] Spółki Akcyjnej w K.‎przeciwko G. Spółce z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością w Ł.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 17 grudnia 2015 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych obu stron od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 26 marca 2015 r., sygn. akt V ACa […], przyjmuje do rozpoznania skargi kasacyjne obu stron. UZASADNIENIE