Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CSK 347/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal regarding bank's refusal to pay debt based on statute of limitations defense.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 347/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiffs against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiffs sought payment from the bank, which argued that the claim was time-barred under the Civil Code. The court upheld the lower court's decision, ruling that the statute of limitations had expired, thereby preventing the plaintiffs from recovering the debt.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 118 k.c.; Art. 230 k.c.: The statute of limitations bars the enforcement of a claim if the limitation period has expired without interruption or suspension, resulting in the dismissal of the action.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
statute of limitations civil code time bar cassation appeal bank debt enforcement barred limitation period

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 118 k.c.
Art. 230 k.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 347/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 8 kwietnia 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz w sprawie z powództwa E. N., H. N., S. N.‎przeciwko […] Bank spółce akcyjnej z siedzibą w W.‎przy udziale Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 8 kwietnia 2022 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powodów od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]z dnia 28 lutego 2019 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], podejmuje postępowanie.