Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 309/16 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation complaints to be heard regarding the establishment of a land registry entry for ownership rights.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 309/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted both cassation complaints for examination without ruling on their merits. The applicant, a joint-stock company, sought to register ownership rights via the land registry, while the respondent, a community management company, opposed the entry. The court decided to proceed with the review because the lower court's procedural handling required further scrutiny under cassation rules.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 389 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept cassation complaints for examination if the lower court's decision involves a violation of procedural rules or misapplication of law, even if the substantive dispute concerns property registration.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation procedure land registry entry ownership rights procedural violation property law dispute

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 389 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 390 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 309/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 grudnia 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z wniosku B. Spółki Akcyjnej z siedzibą w Ł. ‎przy uczestnictwie Spółki dla Zagospodarowania Wspólnoty Leśno-Gruntowej w S. ‎o założenie księgi wieczystej i wpis prawa własności,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 14 grudnia 2016 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych wnioskodawcy i uczestnika postępowania od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w C. ‎z dnia 30 grudnia 2015 r., sygn. akt VI Ca (…), przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania.