Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CSK 278/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a civil dispute.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 278/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the lower court erred in its legal assessment regarding the claim for payment against the municipality. Consequently, the court decided to remit the case for further examination by a higher instance to resolve the legal dispute.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court failed to apply the law correctly, thereby remanding the case for retrial.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal acceptance incorrect application of law civil dispute between individuals municipal liability remittal for retrial Supreme Court jurisdiction procedural error review

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 278/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 31 stycznia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Agnieszka Piotrowska w sprawie z powództwa W. S.‎przeciwko Gminie i Miastu J.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 31 stycznia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 13 grudnia 2018 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE