Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 190/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether enforcement title is voidable due to procedural defects.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 190/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's decision to declare the enforcement title unenforceable. The plaintiff argued that the lower court failed to properly assess specific procedural irregularities affecting the title's validity. Consequently, the court remanded the case for further examination of these substantive procedural grounds rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.: The cassation court may accept an appeal if the lower court failed to examine a ground for declaring the enforcement title voidable, thereby remanding the case for further review of the procedural defects.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
enforcement title voidability procedural defects cassation appeal unenforceability

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 190/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 8 listopada 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Wojciech Katner w sprawie z powództwa R. C.‎przeciwko R. L. i D. L.‎o pozbawienie tytułu wykonawczego wykonalności,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 8 listopada 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 22 listopada 2018 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE