Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CSK 138/16 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal in construction contract dispute over unpaid construction services.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 138/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the construction company against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute involved unpaid services provided by the plaintiff to the defendant building organizations. The court decided to refer the case for further examination based on the merits of the cassation grounds.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's judgment violates the law or if the facts are unclear, thereby remanding the case for further adjudication.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal acceptance construction contract dispute unpaid construction services civil procedure law Supreme Court review

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 138/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 13 września 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Krzysztof Pietrzykowski w sprawie z powództwa Przedsiębiorstwa Budowlanego "R. " Sp. z o.o. w G.‎przeciwko Zarządowi Budynków Miejskich I Towarzystwu Budownictwa Społecznego Sp. z o.o. w G. ‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 13 września 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (….)‎z dnia 17 czerwca 2015 r., sygn. akt V ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.