Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
IV KZ 46/25 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal against refusal to issue written judgment reasoning for criminal conviction.

Numero d'incarto IV KZ 46/25
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's order refusing to provide a written justification for the criminal judgment. The appellant, S.K., challenged the decision not to issue a written reasoning as required by law. The court determined that the procedural requirements for written reasoning were not met in this specific instance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 243 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 243 § 2 k.p.k.: The court may refuse to issue a written reasoning for a criminal judgment if the case is straightforward and the facts are clear, provided the parties are informed of the grounds.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal procedure written reasoning judgment justification appeal dismissal procedural order

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 243 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 243 § 2 k.p.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

IV KZ 46/25 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 20 marca 2026 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Adam Roch w sprawie S.K. po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu w dniu 20 marca 2026 r. zażalenia skazanej na zarządzenie Przewodniczącej VII Wydziału Karnego Odwoławczego Sądu Okręgowego w Katowicach z 3 listopada 2025 r., sygn. VII Ka 548/25 o odmowie przyjęcia wniosku o sporządzenie na piśmie i doręczenie uzasadnienia wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Katowicach z dnia 3 października 2025 r., sygn. VII Ka 548/25 p o s t a n o w i ł: zaskarżone zarządzenie utrzymać w mocy. [WB][r.g.]