Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
III KK 172/20 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal as obviously groundless for theft conviction, ordering defendant to pay costs.

Numero d'incarto III KK 172/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the defense attorney as obviously groundless. The defendant, Z. K., was convicted under Article 286 § 1 of the Criminal Code for theft, and the lower court's judgment was upheld without substantive review. The court ruled that the appeal lacked any legal merit, thereby rejecting the request for review and imposing court costs on the convicted party.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 k.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.k.: The Supreme Court may dismiss a cassation appeal as obviously groundless when the lower court's judgment is legally sound and the appeal raises no new substantive issues, thereby upholding the conviction and awarding costs to the appellant.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
obviously groundless appeal theft conviction cassation procedure court costs Article 286 Criminal Code

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 k.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt III KK 172/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 31 maja 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marek Motuk (przewodniczący)‎SSN Marek Siwek‎SSN Igor Zgoliński (sprawozdawca)Protokolant Małgorzata Czartoryska przy udziale prokuratora Prokuratury Krajowej Roberta Tarsalewskiego ‎w sprawie Z. K.‎skazanej z art. 286 § 1k.k. i inne‎po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na rozprawie‎w dniu 31 maja 2021 r.,‎kasacji wniesionej przez obrońcę‎od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w T.‎z dnia 30 października 2019 r., sygn. akt IX Ka […], ‎zmieniającego wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w T.‎z dnia 5 grudnia 2018 r., sygn. akt II K […], 1) oddala kasację jako oczywiście bezzasadną, 2) obciąża skazaną kosztami sądowymi za postępowanie kasacyjne.