Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
II UZ 62/11 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court quashes appeal decision rejecting request for reasoned judgment due to missed deadline.

Numero d'incarto II UZ 62/11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court quashed the appellate court's decision rejecting the applicant's request for a reasoned judgment and service of the verdict. The applicant argued that the deadline for filing an appeal should only begin after the court addressed the request to restore the missed deadline for the reasoned judgment. The court held that the appellate court failed to evaluate whether the missed deadline was caused by the applicant's fault, violating the duty of due diligence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c. - The court must assess whether a missed procedural deadline was caused by the party's fault; failure to do so prevents proper review of the decision rejecting the request for a reasoned judgment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedural deadline reasoned judgment duty of due diligence fault-based dismissal appellate review service of verdict restoration of term

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
art. 387 § 3 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo