Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II PK 17/11 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court partially allowed lawyer's wage claim, dismissing statute of limitations interruption due to vague settlement summons.

Numero d'incarto II PK 17/11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court partially overturned the lower court's dismissal of Alicja C.'s wage claim against Group L. SA, ordering a retrial on specific salary equalization and court representation costs. While the court found the statutory basis for the wage claim valid, it ruled that the settlement summons failed to interrupt the statute of limitations because it lacked specific details on the underlying cases and amounts. Consequently, the claim was deemed time-barred, and the case was remanded for further proceedings on the remaining issues.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 244 ust. 1 ustawy o radcach prawnych; Art. 291 § 1 k.p.; Art. 295 § 1 k.p.: A settlement summons interrupts the statute of limitations only if it clearly identifies the specific claims, their amounts, and the period of enforceability; a vague summons regarding court representation costs does not constitute such an interruption.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
statute of limitations settlement summons lawyer remuneration court representation costs remedial proceedings statutory interpretation labor law

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 244 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Art. 291 § 1 k.p.
Art. 295 § 1 k.p.
Art. 773 k.p.
Art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39821 k.p.c.
art. 291 § 1 k.p
art. 185 § 1 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
V CSK 238/06
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; failure to specify claims prevents statute of limitations interruption under Civil Code.
III PK 22/06
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; labor court cannot set salary within statutory limits if regulations exist.
I PK 58/02
II PK 180/06
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where employee failed to prove discrimination grounds required by law.
I PK 131/08
I PK 28/09
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; plaintiff failed to prove discrimination or equal treatment violation regarding salary.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo