II PK 4/11
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismissed cassation appeal; false redundancy reason means severance is unjust enrichment. Work contract termination case. Supreme Court of Poland. 2011. II PK 4/11.
Polonia (PL)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the Ministry of Finance against a lower court ruling ordering the return of an unjustified severance payment. The court found that because the employee successfully claimed damages for a false redundancy reason, the legal basis for the severance payment vanished, transforming it into an unjust enrichment claim. Consequently, the lower court correctly ordered the employee to return the funds, and the Supreme Court upheld this decision within the limits of the cassation complaint.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 365 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 410 § 2 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.; If a false redundancy reason entitles an employee to damages, the severance payment loses its legal basis and becomes unjust enrichment.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
unjust enrichment
redundancy termination
severance payment
false redundancy reason
cassation appeal
work contract
employee damages
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 365 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 410 § 2 k.c. w związku z art. 300 k.p.
Art. 411 pkt 1 k.c.
Art. 398 § 13 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 365 § 1 k.p.c
art. 410 § 2 k.c
art. 300 k.p
art. 411 pkt 1 k.c
art. 6 k.c
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IA2005 r., III PK 82/05
2007 r., II PK 29/07
I PK 22/08
Criminal appeal dismissed; civil compensation claim for wrongful dismissal does not automatically include severance pay.
II PK 164/08
Employee dismissed for civil damages without labor law action is barred from claiming unlawful termination.
II PK 112/10
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for damages based on corruption disclosure and personal rights violation.
II PK 108/08
II CSK 12/09
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; prior judgment on land registry entry binds liability but not debt existence.
II PK 302/08
Cassation appeal dismissed; Supreme Court held previous judgment binds parties regarding indefinite-term employment status.