Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I PK 186/09 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal on work accident claim, ruling delivery of termination notice was not an external cause of injury.

Numero d'incarto I PK 186/09
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the recognition of a work accident caused by the delivery of a termination notice. The plaintiff argued this event triggered his health deterioration, while the defendant contended the illness had an independent character and the payment was already made. The court ruled that the delivery of the notice does not constitute an external cause of a work accident under the relevant social insurance laws.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych; Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych: The delivery of a written employer's declaration of termination of the employment contract does not constitute an external cause of a work accident.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
work accident recognition external cause requirement termination notice delivery social insurance liability independent illness character cassation appeal dismissal scope of first instance judgment

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 6 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 30 października 2002 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
Art. 25 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 383 k.p.c.
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 366 k.p.c.
art. 291 § 1 k.p
art. 6 k.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
IV CZ 90/88
I CZ 115/00
CKN 825/97
II CKN 600/07
III CK 323/04
Supreme Court allows appeal against default judgment for construction work, citing procedural errors and missing evidence.
II PK 235/07
Improper authorization of counsel does not equate to failure to show authorization; lack of signature is not fatal. The cassation complaint was dismissed.
II CSK 177/06
Supreme Court dismisses appeal regarding psychiatric hospitalization, ruling first-instance procedural defects fall under appeal review, not cassation.
V CKN 1046/00
III CZP 8/93
II UK 381/03

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo