Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II PK 25/09 Generato dall'IA

Labor court dismissed claim due to civil contract, but Supreme Court remanded for civil proceedings.

Numero d'incarto II PK 25/09
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the work relationship but remanded the case for civil proceedings concerning unpaid wages. The lower labor court rejected the claim solely because the contract was civil rather than labor-based, which the Supreme Court found procedurally flawed. The court ruled that such a dismissal creates a res judicata barrier preventing the plaintiff from seeking the same remedy in a civil court, necessitating a transfer to the civil division.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 379 pkt 4 k.p.c.; Art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.: A labor court cannot dismiss a wage claim solely because the underlying contract is civil, as this creates a res judicata barrier; the case must be remanded to a civil court for proper adjudication.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
labor court jurisdiction civil contract dispute res judicata effect wage claim dismissal procedural invalidity remand to civil court cassation appeal outcome

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 379 pkt 4 k.p.c.
Art. 199 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 22 § 1 k.p
art. 201 § 1 k.s.h
art. 6 k.c
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 47 § 1 k.p.c
art. 366 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
III CZP 119/68
I PK 146/05
Supreme Court allows labor claim dismissal reversal when civil law issues are wrongly filed in labor court.
V CSK 364/06
Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal on insurance contract misrepresentation regarding non-factory immobilizer. The court allows the insurer's refusal based on false declaration. The court held that the non-factory immobilizer did not increase risk. The court ruled that the false declaration excludes coverage. The court found no procedural violation in the judgment. The court determined the appeal was inadmissible. The court rejected the claim for refund of costs.
I CSK 63/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal on implied lease based on 25-year possession and good faith.
I PK 21/02
Supreme Court reversed labor court ruling on construction costs, remanding civil claims for ordinary civil proceedings.
I PK 659/03
Supreme Court allows labor claim dismissal due to lack of employment contract features, remanding for civil law assessment.
I PK 42/04
Supreme Court quashes labor court judgment for civil contract dispute due to improper jury composition.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo