Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PK 26/09 Generato dall'IA

Preliminary employment contract breach allows damages for lost profits and specific limitation periods apply.

Numero d'incarto I PK 26/09
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a breach of a preliminary employment contract, upholding the lower court's award of damages. The plaintiff argued the defendant failed to hire him based on a promise made in 2003, while the defendant claimed the offer was informal and the contract void. The court ruled that the defendant's refusal to hire constituted a breach, entitling the plaintiff to compensation for both actual losses and lost profits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 389 k.c.; Art. 390 § 3 k.c.; Art. 291 § 1 k.p.: In cases of breach of a preliminary contract for a future employment agreement, the limitation period is governed by Art. 390 § 3 of the Civil Code, and damages include both actual losses and lost profits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
preliminary employment contract breach of contract damages lost profits compensation limitation period rules cassation appeal dismissal

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 389 k.c.
Art. 390 § 3 k.c.
Art. 291 § 1 k.p.
Art. 60 k.c.
Art. 65 k.c.
Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 389 k.c
art. 390 § 3 k.c
art. 291 § 1 k.p

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo