III SK 10/09
Generato dall'IA
Supreme Court dismisses fine for non-compliance, ruling cessation means stopping the practice, not voiding prior contracts.
Polonia (PL)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a fine imposed for failing to comply with a competition authority decision. The court held that 'cessation' of an abusive practice requires stopping the conduct itself, not necessarily voiding prior contracts containing the disputed clauses. Consequently, the court found the plaintiff's continued use of old contracts did not constitute non-compliance.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 102 ust. 1 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; Art. 9 ustawy o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów: Cessation of an abusive practice requires the actual discontinuation of the conduct, not merely the removal of its consequences or the invalidation of prior contracts containing the abusive terms.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IA
competition law
abusive practices
dominant position
non-compliance fine
cessation of practice
contract validity
competition authority
Disposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAArt. 102 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 8 ust. 2 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 9 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 8 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Art. 213 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 213 § 1 k.p.c
art. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 32 Konstytucji RP
art. 3531 k.c
art. 6 k.c
Giurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IAIII SK 29/04
III SK 17/06